How DevOpsCheck compares
Most of these tools are excellent and several are free. They answer different questions, and many teams run more than one. This table says what each covers — including where we are weaker.
| DevOpsCheck | OpenSSF Scorecard | GitHub Advanced Security | Snyk | Trivy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free for public repositories | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partly | Yes |
| Opens fix pull requests | Config and CI fixes | — | Dependencies | Dependencies | — |
| Known CVEs in dependencies | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Secrets committed to the repository | Yes | — | Yes | see vendor docs | Yes |
| GitHub Actions supply chain (pinning, token permissions, dangerous triggers) | Yes | Yes | Partly | see vendor docs | — |
| Dockerfile and Kubernetes misconfiguration | Yes | — | — | Yes | Yes |
| Terraform misconfiguration | Yes | — | — | Yes | Yes |
| Code analysis (SAST) | — | — | Yes | Yes | — |
| One score for the whole repository | 0–100 | 0–10 | — | — | — |
| Self-hosted GitLab | Yes | Partly | — | Yes | Yes |
| Runs offline on your machine (CLI) | — | Yes | — | Yes | Yes |
Based on each product's public documentation as of September 2026. Something wrong or out of date? Write to support@devopscheck.com and we will correct it.
Where DevOpsCheck is stronger
- It opens the fix: for configuration findings — workflow permissions, pinned actions, Dockerfile user, Dependabot or Renovate config — the result is a pull request, not a ticket.
- One report and one 0–100 score across secrets, dependencies, CI/CD supply chain, containers and infrastructure — the view a team lead needs, instead of five tools' output.
- Self-hosted GitLab on internal networks, in English and Russian.
Where it is weaker
- No code analysis (SAST): it does not look for bugs in application source. Use CodeQL or Snyk Code for that.
- No offline CLI yet: scans run on our server. Trivy and Scorecard run entirely on your machine.
- A young product with a smaller rule set than the specialised scanners it overlaps with.